Français | English | Español | Português

Russia Media

A mysterious and deadly explosion earlier this month at a naval weapons testing range in northwestern Russia resulted in the deaths of two workers due to radiation sickness, not traumatic injuries, as officials previously indicated, according to a report from an independent newspaper on Wednesday. | 8/22/19
It did not make any sense to analyze the Saturday rally in Moscow as soon as it happened, but Monday appears to be just the right time to do it.  No one talks about the roots of the protest actions that took place in Moscow over the weekend. Most likely, they are not about the registration of certain individuals by the Moscow City Duma as candidates.The issue of the protest itself is broader. People took to the streets during the arrest of journalist Ivan Golunov, during the construction of an Orthodox temple in Yekaterinburg, etc. All those stories are symptoms of one and the same disease. One could see this disease spreading throughout Western Europe and the United States during the 1960s, but the causes of it were different. In the US, it was the Vietnam War and the killing of Martin Luther King. In Europe, there were protests against events in Czechoslovakia and other internal problems.But we remember that it was violation of social justice that defined all those protests. We also remember that many of those protests became "social elevators" for many politicians, who started coming to power in 15 or 20 years. For a very clear understanding of the situation, one may refer to two graffiti that students of the Sorbonne left in the streets of Paris in 1968: Since 1936 I have fought for wage increases. My father before me fought for wage increases. Now I have a TV, a fridge, a Volkswagen. Yet my whole life has been a drag. Don't negotiate with the bosses. Abolish them." "One cannot fall in love with industrial growth!" It appears that the Russian youth could chant the same slogans today, if the education system in Russia has not degraded since the years after the Soviet power. It was not only education that has degraded. The qualification of people who are responsible for the moderation of internal political processes has gone down the toilet as well. Kiriyenko's 'social elevators' serve primarily managers of large corporations, but in case of social upheavals they will humbly step aside to observe. Mass youth movements of Mr. Surkov, the Reaction newspaper and the Yoki website have been disposed of. If one looks at what  presidential grants are allocated to, one will see that they are not needed today, but could be good during the "lush" times. The United States eventually decided to pull out troops from Vietnam, abolish mandatory conscription and promote the PlayBoy technology (the protests are also known as 'sexual revolution' for a reason). Other countries had their own recipes.It is the internal essence of protests that plays the main role in the struggle that one can see in Russia developing today. If one doesn't know the essence, any struggle with external manifestations of protests will be useless.We know one thing. If the authorities remove all problems with the elections to the Moscow City Duma, the public protest will persist. The protest sentiment began to actively develop during the beginning of the pension reform, so it primarily involves the children of those people, whom the authorities have betrayed shamelessly. It has started snowballing for various reasons afterwards getting an increasing amount of citizens involved. It is 's time to open a tender for a team that would replace Sergei Kiriyenko with new ideas. The current political administrators under his leadership lack qualification to solve the issue of stability in the society.Photo:

Just watching Amazon’s teaser trailer for Season 2 of “Jack Ryan” might make you out of breath — imagine how John Krasinski feels.

Amazon Prime Video released the sneak peek for the second season of “Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan” during its busy Saturday morning at the Television Critics Association press tour.

Here’s how Amazon says the sophomore run — pun only kind of intended — will go down:

In the second season of “Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan,” after tracking a potentially suspicious shipment of illegal arms in the Venezuelan jungle, CIA Officer Jack Ryan, portrayed by John Krasinski (“A Quiet Place”), heads down to South America to investigate.

As Jack’s investigation threatens to uncover a far-reaching conspiracy, the President of Venezuela launches a counter-attack that hits home for Jack, leading him and his fellow operatives on a global mission spanning the United States, UK, Russia, and Venezuela to unravel the President’s nefarious plot and bring stability to a country on the brink of chaos.

Also Read: 'Jack Ryan' Star John Krasinski Signs First-Look TV Deal With Amazon Studios

“Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan” is co-produced by Paramount Television and Skydance Television. In addition to Krasinski, the second season also stars  Wendell Pierce (“The Wire”) as James Greer, Noomi Rapace (“Prometheus”) as Harriet ‘Harry’ Baumann and Michael Kelly (“House of Cards”) as Mike November.

The show is executive produced by Andrew Form, Brad Fuller, Michael Bay, Krasinski and Allyson Seeger, along with Carlton Cuse and Graham Roland, who created the series for television.

Additionally, Andrew Bernstein, Vince Calandra, David Graziano, Tom Clancy, David Ellison, Dana Goldberg, Marcy Ross, Mace Neufeld, Lindsey Springer, Dennie Gordon and Phil Abraham also executive produce Season 2.

Also Read: Jill Soloway: 'Transparent' Musical Finale Is Careful Not to Make a 'Celebration' Out of Maura's Death

Krasinski, who first rose to fame as Jim from NBC’s “The Office,” signed a three-year first-look deal with Amazon Studios earlier this week through his Sunday Night production banner. Under the agreement, Krasinksi, alongside his partner, Allyson Seeger, and their production and development executive, Alexa Ginsburg, will develop television series for the studio.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Amazon Misses Q2 Profit Estimates, Halts Its Climb Back to $1 Trillion Valuation

Benedict Cumberbatch and Claire Foy to Star in Drama 'Louis Wain' at Amazon

'The Boys' Gets Early Season 2 Renewal at Amazon; Aya Cash Joins Cast as Stormfront | 7/27/19

Filmmaker Oliver Stone got up close and personal while interviewing Russian president Vladimir Putin, with the two discussing the country’s ban on “homosexual propaganda,” the “behaviours and the thinking of the new generation”… and the possibility of Putin becoming godfather to Stone’s 22-year-old daughter.

Stone — who interviewed the Russian president in June shortly before the July 4 premiere in Italy of his documentary “Revealing Ukraine” — had mentioned pro-Russian Ukrainian politician and Putin ally Viktor Medvedchuk, when Putin said that Medvedchuk asked him to “take part in the christening of his daughter.”

“According to Russian Orthodox tradition, you can’t refuse such a request,” Putin said.

Also Read: Georgian TV Host's Expletive-Laden, Anti-Putin Rant Leads to Station Temporarily Going Off-Air

“Oh, you cannot refuse it?” Oliver responded. “Otherwise I would ask you to be the godfather for my daughter.”

“Does she want to become an Orthodox Christian?” Putin asked.

“Ok, we’ll make her that,” Stone responded, according to a transcript released by the Kremlin.

Stone went on to complain about “young people in America,” saying, “they are spoiled to some degree in the western world” and that he is “shocked by some of the behaviours and the thinking of the new generation.”

“And so much of the argument, so much of the thinking, so much of the newspaper, television commentaries about gender, people identify themselves, and social media, this and that, I’m male, I’m female, I’m transgender, I’m cisgender,” Stone said. “It goes on forever, and there is a big fight about who is who.”

Also Read: Elton John Accuses Vladimir Putin of 'Hypocrisy' on LGBT Rights Following 'Rocketman' Censorship

In 2013, Russia put a law into effect banning “homosexual propaganda” among minors, which LBGTQ groups have said has caused an upsurge in homophobic vigilantism in the country. Stone said of their new legislation, “It seems like maybe that’s a sensible law.”

“Revealing Ukraine” premiered in Russia Friday and has been touted by Russian state media. Although it was supposed to air on a Ukraine TV channel, the broadcast was cancelled because of protests.

You can read the entire transcript of the interview here, including what prompted Stone to tell Putin, “You are a peacemaker” and “I am very worried about you.”

Related stories from TheWrap:

FBI and FTC Must Investigate FaceApp's Ties to Russia, Chuck Schumer Says

High Cost of Aging? FaceApp Users Give Russian Developer 'Perpetual' License to Their Photos

Russian Communist Group Seeks Ban on HBO's 'Chernobyl': 'Ideological Manipulation' | 7/22/19

Georgian news presenter Giorgi Gabunia went off-script on live television Monday, hurling strongly-worded insults at Russian President Vladimir Putin and his late mother.

Rustavi 2, Georgia’s main commercial television channel, went off the air for a few hours after the outburst as a crowd of protestors gathered outside, according to the BBC. The station later apologized for Gabunia’s remarks. In a statement posted on its website, Rustavi 2 said Gabunia violated “the high standards established by our channel.” The station later announced it has suspended Gabunia for two months.

Here’s a light sampling of some of the least expletive-heavy phrases Gabunia aimed at Putin, as translated from Russian by the BBC: “There is no place for such a miserable creature like you, such a freak like you. You are stinking invader… Your mom is dead. Oh, that’s a pity. It really is. Let her burn in hell. Together with you and your father.”

Yikes. You can watch the clip above.

Also Read: Elton John Accuses Vladimir Putin of 'Hypocrisy' on LGBT Rights Following 'Rocketman' Censorship

Putin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said of the comments, “We consider these insults totally unacceptable… All this is simply consequence of the [Georgian] state’s reluctance or inability to restrain extremist youths,” according to the BBC.

“This is a war by provocateurs against their country, a dirty and disgusting game with the security of the state and citizens,” said Georgian Prime Minister Mamuka Bakhtadze, according to the BBC.

Also Read: Jim Carrey Drops Trump's Balls in Putin's Lap With Latest Artwork

Gabunia’s outburst comes at a time when tensions are high between Georgia and Russia. The Associated Press reported that as of Monday, all direct flights between Georgia and Russia have been halted due to a direct order from Putin, following anti-Russian protests in Georgia’s capital city of Tbilisi.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Elton John Accuses Vladimir Putin of 'Hypocrisy' on LGBT Rights Following 'Rocketman' Censorship

Trump Yuks It Up With Putin: 'Fake News Is a Great Term, Isn't It?'

Jim Carrey Taunts Trump About Putin and Saudi Crown Prince's Bromance in Latest Artwork | 7/9/19

CBS has renewed the summer drama “Blood & Treasure” for a second season, the network announced on Wednesday.

Described as a “globe-trotting action-adventure drama,” the series stars Matt Barr as a former FBI agent who teams up with a resourceful art thief, played by Sofia Pernas, to catch a ruthless terrorist who funds his attacks through stolen arts and antiquities.

“‘Blood & Treasure’ is a fun, escapist adventure with comedic elements filmed in multiple locales around the world that has been a great performer and a wonderful addition to our summer schedule,” Amy Reisenbach, executive vice president, Current Programs, CBS Entertainment, said. “We’ve heard the story pitch for season two and look forward to seeing all-new exploits from Russia to Southeast Asia next year.”

Also Read: Ratings: 'Blood & Treasure' Series Premiere Doesn't Bring Riches to CBS

In the weeks since its debut late last month, “Blood & Treasure” has performed well for CBS on Tuesday nights, averaging 5.71 million viewers as the summer’s most-watched new scripted series.

In addition to Barr and Pernas, Oded Fehr, Michael James Shaw, Katia Winter, James Callis, Alicia Coppola, and Mark Gagliardi also star

The series is produced by CBS Television Studios in association with Propagate Content. Matthew Federman, Stephen Scaia, Taylor Elmore, Ben Silverman, Marc Webb, Mark Vlasic and Howard T. Owens are executive producers.

Related stories from TheWrap:

'The Lincoln Lawyer' Series From David E Kelley in the Works at CBS

Arielle Vandenberg to Host CBS' 'Love Island'

'The Good Fight' Creators on What 'Nasty Things' CBS Let Them Keep for the Broadcast Version of Season 1 | 6/26/19
Journalists in southern Russia are protesting the arrest of a newspaper editor on charges of terrorism widely seen as trumped up. | 6/19/19

Dan Harris is stepping down from his post as anchor of ABC’s “Nightline” to focus on growing 10% Happier, a business based on his 2014 book of the same name.

“It is a high class problem: I simply have too many awesome things on my plate, between weekend ‘GMA,’ ‘Nightline,’ and the expanding 10% juggernaut (which, by the way, never would have come into being without an astounding level of support from ABC News),” Harris said in a memo to staff Tuesday. “So why, given all the options, did I decide to drop the ‘Nightline’ anchor gig? Because, frankly, you deserve an anchor who gives it his or her all. This team of amazing producers – who work all hours and travel all over the world – has the right to expect an on-air representative who is in the trenches with you day after day. And the circumstances of my life simply will not allow that right now.”

Harris, who has been with ABC News since 2000 and co-anchored “Nightline” since 2013, will remain as a co-anchor of the weekend of “GMA” and host ABC News’ “10% Happier” podcast.

Also Read: Summer TV Premiere Dates: Here's Every New and Returning Show (Photos)

“I’m happy to tell you that he’ll continue to report his trademark powerful and important, deeply reported stories for ‘Nightline’ and across ABC News,” Goldstone wrote in his own memo to the news division.

“Dan has traveled the world fearlessly for an up close look at some of the most dangerous places on the planet, from Rio de Janeiro’s war on drugs and Vladimir Putin’s Russia to the inner workings of the Sinaloa cartel’s drug operations in Mexico and notorious gang violence in El Salvador,” he continued. “At the same time, it’s been incredibly exciting to witness how Dan’s thriving 10% Happier franchise has grown from a best-selling book to an award-winning podcast, highly-rated app and second best-selling book, drawing millions of fans. It’s a testament to his hard work and a reflection of how vital meditation and mindfulness have become in our modern culture. I can’t wait to see where it goes next.”

See Harris’ full memo to staff below.

Also Read: Ratings: Kevin Durant's NBA Finals Return - and Subsequent Exit - in Game 5 Dominates for ABC


It is surreal to step away from your dream job.

The irony is not lost on me. In my book, 10% Happier, I wrote at length about how I fought and pleaded to anchor Nightline. But it is the success of that book — and its spawn: a podcast and a tech startup — that are the reason I now have to step away.

It is a high class problem: I simply have too many awesome things on my plate, between weekend GMA, Nightline, and the expanding 10% juggernaut (which, by the way, never would have come into being without an astounding level of support from ABC News).

So why, given all the options, did I decide to drop the Nightline anchor gig? Because, frankly, you deserve an anchor who gives it his or her all. This team of amazing producers — who work all hours and travel all over the world — has the right to expect an on-air representative who is in the trenches with you day after day. And the circumstances of my life simply will not allow that right now.

I am not going away. I don’t know where my office will be, but it won’t be far. (Which means Jasmine won’t have to make an arduous journey for the next practical joke she wants to play on me.) More importantly, I will continue working on big, investigative stories. The reports I have been able to file for this show — from the Congo, Haiti, El Salvador, Brazil, Mexico, even Papua New Guinea — have been some of the most meaningful work of my life.

I love Nightline. I love doing these kinds of stories. And I love being part of this incredible culture. None of that will change.

It has been an absolute privilege for me to share the anchor seat for the past five and a half years on one of the most insightful and well-respected news shows on television. Nightline is in great hands with Steve, Juju, Byron and our team of senior producers.

I want to say thank you to everyone at Nightline — for doing some of the best work in broadcast news, for establishing and maintaining one of the most extraordinary collaborative work cultures I have ever seen, and for making fun of me when I deserve it (daily). I look forward to much more.

With immense gratitude,


And here’s Goldston’s note.


After nearly 6 years, Dan Harris has decided to step back from his anchor duties on Nightline to dedicate more time to his rapidly growing 10% Happier business and other roles at ABC News. I’m happy to tell you that he’ll continue to report his trademark powerful and important, deeply reported stories for Nightline and across ABC News.

Dan has traveled the world fearlessly for an up close look at some of the most dangerous places on the planet, from Rio de Janeiro’s war on drugs and Vladimir Putin’s Russia to the inner workings of the Sinaloa cartel’s drug operations in Mexico and notorious gang violence in El Salvador.

At the same time, it’s been incredibly exciting to witness how Dan’s thriving 10% Happier franchise has grown from a best-selling book to an award-winning podcast, highly-rated app and second best-selling book, drawing millions of fans. It’s a testament to his hard work and a reflection of how vital meditation and mindfulness have become in our modern culture. I can’t wait to see where it goes next.

While Dan may be stepping away from the Nightline anchor desk, he will continue to anchor the weekend editions of GMA with Eva, Whit, Adrienne and Rob and host the 10% Happier podcast.

Nightline has long been distinguished by captivating storytelling and in-depth, tenacious journalism. I’m incredibly proud of Steve, Juju, Byron and the entire team for carrying that legacy into the future, including a new slate of documentary features to come. There’s much more great work ahead from this stellar team.

Please join me in thanking Dan for his tremendous work as anchor at Nightline. Below you can read a personal note from him.


Related stories from TheWrap:

Ratings: Kevin Durant's NBA Finals Return – and Subsequent Exit – in Game 5 Dominates for ABC

ABC Talent and Casting Exec Ayo Davis Promoted to EVP, Adds Disney+

Ratings: ABC Dunks on Competition With Game 1 of Warriors-Raptors NBA Finals | 6/11/19

Elton John biopic “Rocketman” was banned from the island nation Samoa last week due to its depiction of homosexuality onscreen.

According to Reuters, the country’s censor told the Samoan local newspaper the Samoa Observer on Monday that the film was not suitable and clashed with the country’s Christian values.

“We’re concerned with the cultural values and also the Christian beliefs here in Samoa — it’s not appropriate for public viewing,” censor Leiataua Niuapu Faaui said.

Also Read: 'Rocketman' Fact Check: Did Elton John Really Take His Stage Name From John Lennon?

In Samoa, “sodomy” is illegal and is punishable by up to seven years in prison. Over 97% of the population is Christian.

Samoa has previously banned the Harvey Milk biopic “Milk” in 2009, as well as the 2006 film “The Da Vinci Code.” Last year, Samoa edited scenes from a screening of the Queen biopic “Bohemian Rhapsody.”

Last month, it was reported that Russia had censored scenes of gay sex from “Rocketman,” an action that earned a sharp criticism from John and the filmmakers.

Also Read: 'Rocketman:' Watch Footage From Elton John's Dodger Stadium Performance (Videos)

“We reject in the strongest possible terms the decision to pander to local laws and censor ‘Rocketman’ for the Russian market, a move we were unaware of until today,” John and the filmmakers said in a statement. “Paramount Pictures have been brave and bold partners in allowing us to create a film which is a true representation of Elton’s extraordinary life, warts and all. That the local distributor has edited out certain scenes, denying the audience the opportunity to see the film as it was intended is a sad reflection of the divided world we still live in and how it can still be so cruelly unaccepting of the love between two people. We believe in building bridges and open dialogue, and will continue to push for the breaking down of barriers until all people are heard equally across the world.”

“Rocketman” stars Taron Egerton as John in a musical biopic about the British pop singer’s life and career.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Elton John and 'Rocketman' Filmmakers Condemn Russian Censorship of Film

'Rocketman:' What Was Elton John's Real Troubadour Concert Like?

'Rocketman' Film Review: Elton John Gets a Musical Fantasy That Sometimes Achieves Liftoff | 6/11/19

This weekend, a European phenomenon is back — though Americans may have to hunt for clips on YouTube or seek out a VPN and watch via another country’s home broadcaster.

The Eurovision Song Contest, a cross between “The X Factor” and the Miss Universe pageant that offers Yanks a glimpse of what it’s like to be in a culture that doesn’t have jazz and blues as the foundation of its pop music.

For those who’ve never seen — or even heard of Eurovision — before, here’s a quick primer to get you caught up.

Also Read: Taylor Swift on 'Taylor Swift Award' Win: 'I'm Really Super Relieved' (Video)

What exactly is this contest?
Eurovision began as an idea back in the mid-1950s as a way for Europe to come together after World War II had ripped it apart. It was a pretty revolutionary effort for its time. Television was still the Wild West of communications and the Olympics hadn’t yet become an international broadcasting event. Eurovision was one of the first major attempts to hold an event that people from a wide range of countries could watch. With that in mind, the organizers wanted each country to showcase a song that was indicative of their culture.

That sounds like a pretty noble goal.
Yes … but it was also very out of touch with what was happening with music at the time. Rock ‘n’ roll was beginning to take root and The Beatles would take the world by storm just a few years after Eurovision’s inception. This meant that Eurovision’s lineup of ballads and cultural pieces quickly felt antiquated compared to the rock revolution that was going on in the charts. And that was six decades ago … the entries would only get weirder from there.

How weird?
For starters, there was once a rule implemented on and off over the years stating that participants could only enter songs that were in their country’s main language. When that rule was in effect, some countries found a loophole: give the song a hook that involves complete gibberish. Songs with titles like “Boom Boom” and “Diggi-loo Diggi-ley” poured out while the home-language rule was in effect.

Then there are the artists themselves. As Eurovision has evolved, more and more ridiculous acts have come out of the woodwork. Finnish monster-rock bands, Russian grandmas and Latvian pirates are among the acts that have performed for a TV audience of hundreds of millions in recent Eurovisions. And that Finnish monster rock band actually won.

Also Read: Celine Dion's Brother Daniel Dies Just 2 Days After Her Husband

Jeez! So is this just some musical freak show?
Well … let’s be fair. While there’s always been some silly novelty acts, there’s also some solid bits of Europop on hand every year from genuinely talented folks. Sweden won in 2012 with “Euphoria,” a soaring dance track by “Idol” contestant Loreen that went multi-platinum in her country after her victory.

There’s also a small handful of top stars on the winners’ list you might recognize. ABBA used Eurovision as a launch pad to stardom in 1974 with their song “Waterloo,” and French-Canadian Celine Dion’s win in 1988 was her biggest claim to fame before “Titanic” came out. Quality — or at least creativity — does tend to win out at Eurovision.

OK, so how does this contest work?
First, all the countries have a national contest where they vote on which song will represent at Eurovision. The participants are divided up into two semifinals, with the exception of the host nation and the “Big Five” countries — France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the U.K. — who automatically qualify for the final.  They are joined by the 10 countries that get the most votes in each semifinal. In the final, all 26 countries get three minutes to make a good impression, and then the whole continent votes “Idol”-style (not for their home country, of course), as do professional juries for each country.

Then the show transitions to a long procession of national “ambassadors” reading out who each country gave their votes to. The top 10 performers in each country’s vote get points, with 12 points going to the top vote-getter, followed by 10 and then eight down to one for the rest of the order. The same goes with the juries, but with 10 points going to the performer in first place.

And what does the performer with the most points win?
This trophy. Oh, and their country gets to host the competition next year.

What? No prize money? No contract? No vague promises of superstardom?
Nope. The winners do get their 15 minutes of fame and some success on the charts, but beyond ABBA and Celine, Eurovision winners almost never have long-term success. Again, Eurovision long ago moved away from the sort of music that leaves a lasting cultural impact.

Even now, a good chunk of the acts are homogenous power ballads that can blur together when performed in succession. Still, Eurovision is worth watching just for the spectacle of it all. The Disneyland-esque sweetness of the proceedings is charming, and the lack of stakes for the performers keeps it feeling light and fun rather than a battle for wealth, glory, and continental supremacy.

Also Read: 'Can't Stop the Feeling': Justin Timberlake Drops Catchy New Single (Video)

It has also made headlines in recent years that have allowed it to take steps beyond the realm of annual oddities like the Running of the Bulls. The winner in 2014 was gay Austrian singer Thomas Neuwirth, who performed as drag queen superstar Conchita Wurst. The victory transformed Conchita into an LGBT icon in Europe, even as Russian conservatives raged in fury and used the singer as an example of why Russia shouldn’t be a part of the EU. For all of Eurovision’s platitudes about tolerance and peace, this was a moment where those ideals were actually acted upon, even if it meant breaking the general tone of inoffensiveness.

If it’s supposed to be European, why is Australia a competitor?
It turns out that Eurovision has a major cult following in Australia, and they were invited to compete several years ago as a thanks for all the support down under. The expansion of the European Union means countries like Azerbaijan and Israel get to compete too.

So…if all these countries that aren’t strictly European are competing, does this mean we may be seeing the USA compete in Eurovision soon?
Eh…don’t count on it.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Taylor Swift Dances 'Like No One's Watching' to The Darkness in New Apple Music Ad (Video)

Led Zeppelin Copyright Case Heats Up as Lawyers Clash Over Music Experts

Music Mogul Irving Azoff to YouTube: Stop Pretending You Love Musicians

Eurovision's 9 Most Famous and Bizarre Moments, From ABBA to Russian Grandmas (Videos) | 5/18/19

Woody Allen’s film “A Rainy Day in New York” has been picked up for distribution in multiple European, South American and Asian territories, according to the New York Times.

On Monday, TheWrap reported that Italian distributor Lucky Red acquired the film for release in Italy on Oct. 3. The Times notes that A Contracorriente Films will now also release “A Rainy Day in New York” the following day on Oct. 4 in Spain.

A spokesperson told the Times that Filmwelt/NFP will release the film in Germany and Austria, and Filmwelt/NFP’s managing director Christopher Ott said in an interview with a German newspaper that they would be among the distributors bringing the film to Europe, China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and South America.

Also Read: Amazon Fires Back at Woody Allen Over Breach of Contract Lawsuit

Italian news reports said on Monday said that “A Rainy Day in New York” was also likely to be shown in France, the Netherlands and Belgium.

Allen’s film was blocked for release in the U.S. after distributor Amazon Studios terminated its four-picture deal with the director after the resurfacing of old accusations that Allen inappropriately touched Dylan Farrow, his then-7-year-old daughter with ex-girlfriend Mia Farrow. (Investigators found no evidence of abuse and Allen has repeatedly denied the accusations.)

In February, Allen responded and filed a $68 million lawsuit against Amazon Studios, claiming breach of contract. In April, Amazon pushed back and said it was “justified” in terminating the contract.

Also Read: Hollywood's Highest Paid Executives: Who Made Bank, Who Sank in 2018 (Updating)

Allen had also announced plans to shoot another film with the backing of Barcelona-based financing conglomerate Mediapro, which previously helped fund “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” and “Midnight in Paris.”

“A Rainy Day in New York” stars Elle Fanning and Timothée Chalamet as two young people who arrive in New York and encounter rain and a series of unfortunate adventures. It also stars Rebecca Hall, Selena Gomez, Jude Law, Suki Waterhouse, Liev Schreiber and Diego Luna. Many of the stars of the film, including Chalamet and Hall, agreed to donate their salaries from the film to Time’s Up and LGBT charities.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Woody Allen Memoir Proposal Rejected by 4 Publishers (Report)

Javier Bardem Blasts 'Public Lynching' of 'Genius' Woody Allen

Mia Farrow on Her Time With Woody Allen: 'It's Not All Black or White' | 5/9/19

As one watches Werner Herzog and André Singer’s documentary “Meeting Gorbachev,” the mind floats back to the words of the late Gene Siskel, the film critic who was known for, amongst other things, a hypothetical question he posed to filmmakers: “Is my film more interesting than a documentary of the same actors having lunch together?”

“Meeting Gorbachev” is a film about Werner Herzog and Mikhail Gorbachev, the last president of the Soviet Union, having a series of three conversations, including one during which they enjoy fancy chocolates. It’s a conversation so deeply fascinating that there’s nothing else the filmmakers could have done to spice it up. Herzog and Gorbachev could have joined forces to halt an alien invasion and invent time travel, and it still wouldn’t have packed the same wallop.

Herzog narrates “Meeting Gorbachev,” which intercuts his interviews with documentary footage and historical context. If you knew little or nothing about Gorbachev, the information is vital and humane, and sometimes comical. We witness the young life of Gorbachev as he grows from a poor farmer to a powerful political force. He ascended to the highest office in the land in the 1980s, after a morbidly absurd number of leaders died before him.

Watch Video: Werner Herzog Says Mikhail Gorbachev Is Filled With 'Existential Solitude'

What followed was an unprecedented era in Russian history, as Gorbachev reached out to the west and helped bring an end to the Cold War. Gorbachev tells Herzog that he wanted “more democracy,” before adding — with perfect comic timing — “I also wanted more socialism.”

Few documentarians have mastered the interview process like Werner Herzog, who playfully pulls his subjects outside their comfort zone with unexpected poetic insights and unusual observations. He opens his interview with Gorbachev, who was a teenager during World War II, by joking that “the first German you met probably wanted to kill you.” He’s surprised to discover that not only was that not true, but Gorbachev’s real first experience with Germans was charming and, since candy was involved, delicious.

Also Read: Daniel Stein Named Executive Chairman of 1091, Formerly The Orchard

Gorbachev’s ability to ingratiate himself beyond all expectations was instrumental to the sweeping political change he helped profligate in the 1980s and 1990s, a journey that Herzog and Singer outline in succinct detail. But they don’t get lost in the nuts and bolts. It’s easy now, decades later, to think of Gorbachev as a historical figure. “Meeting Gorbachev” isn’t about educating audiences on Gorbachev’s life — it’s too fawning to be credible as an objective document — it’s about meeting Gorbachev. Sitting in the same room, getting to know him, and illuminating his humanity while the 88-year-old politician is still around to show it.

And although “Meeting Gorbachev” does an excellent job of making the world-changing leader seem like a warm human being, fond of poetry and chocolate and deeply mourning the loss of his late wife, there are moments of resentment that seep in, and moments of bleak humor. Reflecting on the aftermath of his presidency, where power was seized and Russia turned away from Gorbachev’s political agenda, the ex-President admits he regrets “not sending [Boris] Yeltsin off somewhere.”

Also Read: 'The Mandalorian': Giancarlo Esposito, Werner Herzog and More Board 'Star Wars' TV Show

Though clearly entrenched in the past, any look at our political history is bound to in some way reflect on the present. Gorbachev’s condemnation of “reckless politicians” seems particularly pointed, and his declaration that “people who don’t understand disarmament and cooperation should [not be in] politics” is bound to a elicit a response from certain members of the audience, who no doubt have similar leanings in these comparable times.

“Meeting Gorbachev” only dips its toe into the waters of topicality. A few parallels here, a pointed remark there. The most glaring image of the whole film is at the funeral for Gorbachev’s wife, Raisa Gorbacheva, when a young Vladimir Putin can be seen looming over her open casket. Nothing is said of this moment, nothing pointed follows, and very little is said of Putin’s regime. There’s an elephant in the room, and we cut away before the stampede.

“Meeting Gorbachev” was brought to you by the History channel, and cinematically it has a made-for-television vibe. No doubt many audience members will find themselves nostalgic for watching cable on a Sunday afternoon with their dads. The footage, some of it from previous documentaries, is presented mostly as matter-of-fact, although the filmmakers can’t seem to resist a few cinematic gags, like floating the camera around a statue of Gorbachev at pivotal moments in a speech.

The real show here is Herzog and Gorbachev, two of the most interesting people in the world, getting to know each other, asking the big questions, fumbling through small talk, and becoming friends. You may already know everything there is to know about Mikhail Gorbachev. But you’ve probably never sat down with him for hours on end, and you’ve probably never empathized with him so much that you cried. For that you have this movie, and what a fascinating movie it is.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Werner Herzog Loves LA: It's 'The City With the Most Substance'

What Scares Werner Herzog? 'Nothing – Period' (Exclusive Video)

'Salt and Fire' Director Werner Herzog Exclusive StudioWrap Portraits

'Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World' Review: Werner Herzog Skims the Internet | 5/3/19

Americans, it seems, can’t get enough of the Mueller Report with the dense 448 page probe into potential collusion between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign holding three of the top four spots on Amazon’s best seller list on Monday.

The number one spot was held by a 736 page edition put out by the Scribner and the Washington Post and billed on Amazon as “the only book with exclusive analysis by the Pulitzer Prize-winning staff of The Washington Post, and the most complete and authoritative available.”

Paperback editions of the report were selling for $10.22.

Also Read: MSNBC Criticized for 'Ambush' of Robert Mueller After Easter Church Service: 'Disgusting and Rude'

The number two spot was a $9.20 edition from Skyhorse Publishing, which leaned heavily on an introduction from Alan Dershowitz. The Harvard law professor has spent more than a year making the rounds on television, offering speculation about what might be in the report’s final conclusions.

“Alan Dershowitz is one of the most famous and celebrated lawyers in America. He was the youngest full professor in Harvard Law School history, where he is now the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus,” reads a product description. “Dershowitz is the author of numerous bestselling books, including the New York Times bestseller, ‘The Case Against Impeaching Trump.'”

A third version by Melville House was in fourth place on Amazon, with a no frills $7.40 edition. The only other book among Amazon’s top four best sellers was Delia Owens’ “Where the Crawdads Sing,” which ranked third.

The Amazon numbers suggest Americans were more than willing to pay for convenience, as the entire report is available for free on the Justice Department’s website. You can read it here.

Also Read: Fox News' Andrew Napolitano Says Mueller Report 'Might Be Enough to Prosecute' Trump

On Thursday, Attorney General William Barr delivered the full repot to Congress and posted the complete document (with redactions) online. Dashing many liberal hopes, the report found no evidence of organized collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and declined to indict the president on obstruction of justice charges.

“There was relentless speculation in the news media about the president’s personal culpability, yet as he said from the beginning, there was, in fact, no collusion,” Barr told reporters during a press conference in advance of the release in which he also attempted to explain some of the president’s behavior during the probe.

“There is substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents and fueled by illegal leaks,” Barr said.

Related stories from TheWrap:

BuzzFeed Finally Updates Story That Claimed Trump 'Directed' Michael Cohen to Lie to Congress

Fox News' Andrew Napolitano Says Mueller Report 'Might Be Enough to Prosecute' Trump

Colbert Thinks Trump 'Must Be so Proud' of Bill Barr's 'Baldfaced Lie' About Mueller Report (Video)

Jim Carrey Goes Into 'Exorcist' Mode on Trump After Mueller Report Is Released | 4/22/19

MSNBC came in for criticism on Sunday after reporter Mike Viqueira attempted to question special counsel Robert Mueller as he left Easter church services in Washington, D.C.

“Will you testify before Congress, sir? If he were anybody but the president, would Mr. Trump be indicted, sir?” Viqueira asked as Mueller struggled to get into his car. “Sir, why didn’t you make a recommendation to Congress one way or the other? Did the attorney general accurately characterize your positions on conspiracy and obstruction, sir?”

In response to each question, Mueller replied “no comment,” before heading into his car and driving away.

Also Read: Robert De Niro Calls Playing Robert Mueller on 'SNL' a 'Civic Duty' (Video)

Mueller has almost never been heard from in any form during the course of his nearly two-year investigation into Russian collusion in the 2016 presidential election.

The Mueller probe, which wrapped last week, found that there had been no organized collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, and also declined to indict the president for obstruction of justice.

Also Read: Fox News' Andrew Napolitano Says Mueller Report 'Might Be Enough to Prosecute' Trump

MSNBC’s man-on-the street style reporting on Sunday is more commonly found on celebrity websites like TMZ. And while the network may have been looking to burnish its “truth to power” credentials, the moment was panned online with many on the right and the left criticizing the aggressive approach taken just after church services — with some wondering why the left-wing media organization didn’t get in Mueller’s face before the conclusion of his investigation.

“It’s always a good look for a media outlet @MSNBC to go and ambush someone on his way to church especially Easter service,” Fox Nation host David Webb said in response to the video.

“This is probably not the best look,” noted author and liberal columnist Molly Jong-Fast.

“This is very gross. Don’t do this,” Vox senior correspondent German Lopez added.

Reps for MSNBC did not immediately respond to request for comment from TheWrap.

You can read more of the critics below.

It’s always a good look for a media outlet @MSNBC to go and ambush someone on his way to church especially Easter service. #sarcasm #Mueller #MuellersReport @NBCPolitics @NBCNews

– David Webb (@davidwebbshow) April 22, 2019

This is probably not the best look.

— Molly Jong-Fast (@MollyJongFast) April 21, 2019

This is painful to watch.

— Gabby Orr (@GabbyOrr_) April 22, 2019

Disgusting and rude.

— Mary ???? (@mchastain81) April 21, 2019

lol clown.

— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) April 21, 2019

This is very gross. Don't do this.

— German Lopez (@germanrlopez) April 21, 2019

Ladies and gentlemen, our national news media

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 21, 2019

maybe we didn’t need to send the paparazzi after Robert Mueller on

— Alex Thomas (@AlexThomasDC) April 21, 2019

Libs last week: [Wearing "It's Mueller Time" t-shirt and retweeting a Krassenstein brother] "Mueller is a hero and a patriot!!"

Libs this week: "Sir, why didn't you tell congress to impeach are you a Russian asset??!?!"

— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) April 21, 2019

MSNBC harassing people at church on Easter Sunday

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) April 21, 2019

Related stories from TheWrap:

Former Fox News and MSNBC Host Greta Van Susteren to Return to Television With New Show

Trump Mocks MSNBC, CNN Ratings Drops After Mueller Probe: 'Fake News Never Wins!'

Prosecutors: Coast Guard Lieutenant Planned to Kill CNN and MSNBC Hosts, Prominent Democrats

Trump Thanks MSNBC for Report That Senate Committee Has Found No Evidence of Collusion | 4/22/19

Swedish actress Bibi Andersson, known for her roles in “The Seventh Seal” and “Persona,” died on Sunday, according to Stockholm newspaper Aftonbladet. She was 83.

“She has been sick for many years, but it is sad. I found out that Bibi passed away lunchtime today,” director and friend Christina Olofsson told Aftonbladet.

According to Aftonbladet, Andersson had a stroke in 2009 while living in France with her husband Gabriel Mora Baeza. She returned to Sweden a few days later for hospital care. Shortly thereafter, she moved to a nursing home in Stockholm.

Also Read: British Comic Ian Cognito, 60, Dies on Stage During Stand-Up Performance

Andersson, who starred in several of writer and director Ingmar Bergman’s classic films, became well-known in the 1950’s, appearing in “The Seventh Seal” and “Wild Strawberries,” among countless other films.

She would go on to work constantly throughout the ’60s, ’70s and subsequent decades and as recently as 2007, with roles in more than 50 films such as “Persona,” “The Touch” and “Scenes From a Marriage.”

In 1968 Anderson was nominated for best foreign actress at the BAFTAs for her roles in two films: “Persona” and “Syskonbädd 1782,” or “My Sister My Love.” At the 13th Berlin International Film Festival in 1963, Andersson won the Silver Bear for best actress for her role in Vilgot Sjöman’s film “The Mistress.”

Related stories from TheWrap:

'Searching for Ingmar Bergman' Film Review: Margarethe von Trotta Explores Her Love of Swedish Auteur's Work

Seymour Cassel, Actor in Numerous Wes Anderson Films, Dies at 84

Nadja Regin, 'From Russia With Love' and 'Goldfinger' Actress, Dies at 87 | 4/14/19
Serbia's state television says that Mirjana Markovic, the widow of former strongman Slobodan Milosevic, has died in Russia. | 4/14/19

CNN offered a defense of their frequent town hall events with the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, responding to a Daily Caller article by saying that they weren’t in it for the ratings but rather because it was “the right thing to do.”

“CNN does not host presidential town halls for ratings,” the company said through the @CNNPR Twitter account. “We host them because substantive conversations with presidential candidates inform and empower voters to make the best possible choices for their families and communities. And it’s the right thing to do.”

The Daily Caller piece by reporter Mike Brest took aim at the network by noting how every one of CNN’s 12 Democratic presidential town halls had come far behind Fox News and MSNBC’s regularly scheduled programming.

Also Read: Mark Geragos Blasts 'Lame-Ass' CNN as 'Know-Nothing Network' After Firing as Commentator

“The average viewership of CNN’s town halls were approximately 903,000 people,” Brest reported. “Comparatively, the Fox News programming that was going on while the town halls aired averaged 2.2 million viewers, whereas the MSNBC programming had 1.8 million viewers.”

The story received a big boost from President Trump, who retweeted it to his nearly 60 million followers.

CNN — which has long placed third in ratings behind their more opinionated rivals — rarely responds to negative ratings stories, but according to network media reporter Brian Stelter, the presidential retweet “prompted CNN P.R. to respond with a useful reminder that ratings are not the only rubric for a television network.”

With the 2020 Democratic presidential primary now well underway, CNN has looked to set itself up as a leader in early town hall events with candidates. The channel has presented talks with Sens. Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker and Kirsten Gillibrand. The network has also sponsored events with South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz.

Related stories from TheWrap:

Trump Mocks MSNBC, CNN Ratings Drops After Mueller Probe: 'Fake News Never Wins!'

Mark Geragos Blasts 'Lame-Ass' CNN as 'Know-Nothing Network' After Firing as Commentator

Rudy Giuliani Calls on CNN to Apologize for Trump-Russia Coverage (Video)

Mark Geragos Dropped by CNN After Being Identified by WSJ as Co-Conspirator in Michael Avenatti Case | 4/12/19

Epix has canceled the Paramount TV spy drama “Berlin Station” after three seasons, TheWrap has learned.

Created and executive produced by author Olen Steinhauer, the series centered on Richard Armitage as a spy working for the CIA in Europe. The third season, which wrapped its run last month, took a timely turn to focus on the relationship between Russia and the U.S., with the CIA trying to determine if the Kremlin had been involved in foul play.

Michelle Forbes, Richard Jenkins, Rhys Ifans, Leland Orser, Ashley Judd, Keke Palmer and Ismael Cruz Córdova also starred.

Also Read: Don't Expect a 'Gotham' Crossover on Epix's Alfred Prequel 'Pennyworth'

Jason Horwitch served as showrunner and executive producer on the series from Paramount Television and Anonymous Content, along with Eric Roth, Steve Golin, Kerry Kohansky-Roberts, Keith Redmon and Luke Rivett.

The cancellation comes as Epix ramps up another big push on the scripted originals front, with the Batman prequel “Pennyworth,” “Godfather of Harlem” and “Perpetual Grace, LTD” all set to premiere this year. The network’s current slate also includes the Ray Romano comedy “Get Shorty.”

Related stories from TheWrap:

Don't Expect a 'Gotham' Crossover on Epix's Alfred Prequel 'Pennyworth'

MGM's Epix Launches Streaming Service Priced at $5.99 Per Month

Epix Picks Up 'Belgravia' Limited Series From 'Downton Abbey' Creator Julian Fellowes | 3/30/19

“Fox & Friends” took a victory lap on Monday after Attorney General Williams Barr concluded that the Mueller report did not find sufficient evidence of collusion or a criminal conspiracy between Donald Trump and the Russians.

On set hosts and regular guests lauded as a complete exoneration of the president. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, a longtime friend of the show, trashed some of the more breathless coverage of the Mueller investigation and said a lot of apologies were owned to the American public.

“I think a lot of apologies are due to the American public about being misled by many in the media who substituted wishful thinking for factual analysis,” he said.

Also Read: NYU Journalism School Hires Ex-New Yorker Fact Checker Who Falsely Said ICE Agent Had Nazi Tattoo

“With all due modesty, if they had just listened to me from day one, they would have gotten it straight. I called it exactly right,” he added. “I wish the folks over on CNN would have done the same thing. They didn’t. All they did was ‘oh, he is gonna be indicted because we want him to be indicted. He did collude because we want him to collude. He obstructed because we wanted him to have obstructed.’ That’s not news analysis; that’s advocacy journalism.”

“Fox & Friends” hosts Brian Kilmeade, Steve Doocy and Ainsley Earhardt were in complete agreement.

Also Read: Hollywood Stars Downplay Barr's Summary of Mueller Russia Probe: 'Only the Full Report Matters'

“This morning we wake up and the media doesn’t just have a little egg on its face, they have a whole omelette,” Doocy said. During another moment on set, he triumphantly waved around a newspaper with headlines conceding the point to Trump as well, saying the New York Times headline touting the findings “probably killed whoever had to type this in.”

On Monday, it wasn’t just “Fox & Friends” who had the knives out for the mainstream media. MSNBC — whose anchors and contributors have spent years publicly suggesting additional indictments against Trump and his family were imminent — were also facing bipartisan blowback.

“MSNBC hosts should collectively go on the air, bow their heads in shame, and apologize to the public for what they’ve done,” the Intercept co-founder Glenn Greenwald said in a tweet. “Outlets should fire the ex-CIA, NSA and Pentagon officials who used their disinformation training to help these ‘news agencies’ mislead everyone.”

Noted tech journalist Tim Pool accused much of MSNBC coverage of the Trump-Russia story of resembling Infowars.

“This is like Bizarro Infowars,” he wrote, linking to video of anchor Chris Hayes. “MSNBC doing all it can to help Trump win re-election in 2020.”

Reps for CNN and MSNBC did not immediately respond to request for comment from TheWrap.

Related stories from TheWrap:

'Fox & Friends' Fires Back at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 'Be Quiet, Come Back When You Grow Up' (Video)

'Fox & Friends' Host Pete Hegseth Hasn't Washed His Hands in 10 Years: 'Germs Are Not a Real Thing'

'Fox & Friends' Pushes Howard Schultz Presidential Run: 'He's Making 100 Percent Sense' (Video)

'Fox & Friends' Tells Trump He 'Cares Way Too Much About People in the Media' | 3/25/19
Russian state television praised a “hi-tech robot” at a technology forum that was actually a man inside a robot suit. | 12/13/18

Iraqi director Mohamed Al-Daradji can remember the exact day he was held hostage by Al Qaeda: Dec 16, 2004. Al-Daradji and his film crew at the time had guns pointed at their heads, seconds away from death. It was during a time when he thought terrorists were only evil men. In the coming years, Al-Daradji realized there was something more sinister behind the madness.

“Usually the victims are women, but a lot of women since 2003 have become suicide bombers,” the director told TheWrap’s Steve Pond at a Q&A on Monday following a screening of his film, “The Journey” at the Landmark Theatres in Los Angeles. The film is Iraq’s entry into the Oscar foreign film race.

“Is she in control, or are they [Al Qaeda] in control?” is the question Al-Daradji sought to answer in “The Journey,” a film he was inspired to make after being taken hostage.

Also Read: Gerard Butler's 'Hunter Killer' Blocked From Release in Russia Hours Before First Screening

“At that moment, I was lost,” Al-Daradji said of his state of mind while being held captive. “I used the emotion of that moment for this film.”

“The Journey” is a drama that follows a young female terrorist in Baghdad who has to confront how she ended up with a bomb strapped to her chest ready to kill innocent Iraqis. Lead character Sara (Zahraa Ghandour) begins as a stone-cold Al Qaeda member who encounters a hustler Salam (Ameer Jabarah) at a train station. When Salam tries to make Sara his next victim, she takes advantage of the situation by taking “the sinner” hostage, with the threat of bombing the train station at any second.

But the duo runs into a problem when they find a baby left in a travel bag. Salam wants to take the baby into his care, but Sara has orders to kill. Slowly, Sara begins to question whether killing the innocent for the sake of God is really what she wants to do.

Also Read: Saudi Arabia to Seek Death Penalty for 5 Suspects in Journalist's Killing

If Al-Daradji found the initial inspiration for “The Journey” in 2004, then in 2008, he was able to put a face to that story. Al-Daradji was shooting his second feature film when he read a newspaper article about a young girl who was minutes away from bombing a police station. The picture used for the article showed the young girl in a moment of regret, with a soldier trying to cut off her vest because she couldn’t go through with the suicide bombing.

It was then when Al-Daradji’s focus became about telling a story about women who were roped into becoming suicide bombers. A few years later he would meet women in an Iraqi prison who were detained because they tried to “cleanse” society by mass killing. One particular girl in front of him with steely eyes stood out, and eventually became the foundation for Sara.

“I saw the humanity in her,” Al-Daradji said.

Also Read: 'Girl' Director on Screening Trans Film Now: 'Let's Invite Trump to Come Watch'

To build the world around Sara was difficult, Al-Daradji said. Not only would Al-Daradji need to film on location at the Baghdad train station, but he needed to use non-professional actors as well. From the beginning of the writing process to showing the film in Iraqi theaters (the first Iraqi film to do so in decades), the filmmaking process took nearly 5 years. Two of those years involved training Ghandour to become the complex terrorist she would have to be.

“Inside every human, there is an artist,” Al Daradji said.

Also Read: 'Girl' Director on Screening Trans Film Now: 'Let's Invite Trump to Come Watch'

The shoot took about three months, a process which involved shooting between 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. in order to avoid the noise of the actual trains coming to and from the station.

The reception of “The Journey” in Iraq has been complicated, Al-Daradji confessed. While it was shown in seven cities with a mostly positive reception, the audiences have been divided about accepting that their way of life is in question.

“Some people want to start the conversation, some don’t,” he said.

Related stories from TheWrap:

How Hollywood Can Help Overcome Negative Perceptions of Muslims (Guest Column)

Hollywood Muslims Respond to 'Roseanne' Scandal: 'We're Forgotten'

'Girl' Director on Screening Trans Film Now: 'Let's Invite Trump to Come Watch' | 11/27/18

“The Walking Dead” creator Robert Kirkman’s next apocalyptic tale is taking shape: Kirkman’s Skybound Entertainment and Entertainment One (eOne) have signed an agreement to produce “5 Year,” an international series chronicling the final five years before a fatal meteor ends the Earth.

Per the project’s official description: From an original idea from Robert Kirkman, “5 Year”s different series will focus on how people across the globe choose to live after learning the world will end in the next five years, as a meteor rushes towards Earth. Each year will play out as a season, and while each version will have its own unique characters and stories, they will all follow the same timeline. Each version of “5 Year” will be a localized story set in the markets’ actual location and produced in local languages.

Also Read: 'Walking Dead' Mid-Season 9 Trailer: Oh, Good - Alpha and Beta Are Here (Video)

EOne and Skybound will co-produce the series, with eOne serving as financier and distributor. The new Skybound and eOne partnership includes previously-announced “5 Year” series set in Latin America — with producers Mixer and 360 Powwow — and in Korea — with streaming service Viki — and also covers installments of the series now in the works in Italy, Germany, Russia, China, the UK and more.

Kirkman, David Alpert, Bryan Furst, and Sean Furst will executive produce the project for Skybound.

“This is one of the most ambitious projects we’ve worked on, and also one of the most rewarding. Our work with all our partners around the globe continues to inspire our vision for this series and our commitment and passion for global storytelling. ‘5 Year’ is a fundamentally human story, meant to explore humanity’s capacity for good and evil in the face of the ultimate threat. eOne is a world class producer and distributor of television and they share our vision and ambition for this huge undertaking. We are very happy to have them as our partner,” said Bryan and Sean Furst in a joint statement.

Also Read: 'Walking Dead': So What's Gonna Happen With Negan After His Big Mid-Season Finale Moment?

“We couldn’t possibly pass up the opportunity to work on a truly innovative project that blends multiple, local productions seamlessly into a story as it happens globally. Robert’s talent for creating content universes and connecting with audiences through bold storytelling makes this partnership most exciting for us and we are thrilled to join forces with him and the Skybound team to bring a multi-level story like the 5 Year universe to audiences around the world. In Skybound, we have found a partner that shares our drive to create future-facing content with worldwide appeal that challenges conventions and spark imaginations,” said Peter Micelli, eOne’s Chief Strategy Officer, Film & Television.

Related stories from TheWrap:

'Walking Dead': Are We Going to See Maggie Again This Season – or Ever?

'Walking Dead' Midseason Finale Loses 35 Percent of Last Year's Viewers

'Walking Dead': So What's Gonna Happen With Negan After His Big Mid-Season Finale Moment?

Here's When the Season 9 Mid-Season Premiere of 'The Walking Dead' Will Air | 11/27/18
The papers cover an idea to introduce group GP appointments and say Russia targets teenagers online. | 10/6/18
The papers focus on alleged cyber attacks by Russia - including one thwarted in the Netherlands. | 10/5/18
I am Dmitry Sudakov, Pravda.Ru English editor. On October 3, Pravda.Ru took part in Reddit's AMA (Ask Me Anything) online conference, in which various people from around the world - policy-makers, representatives of the entertainment industry, and so on and so forth - log on to Reddit so that site visitors could ask them anything in real time. When an AMA moderator approached me, I accepted the offer without knowing what the whole thing would look like. I thought it would be good to participate in the event, because Reddit is such a popular platform in the West. I knew that an editor of a Russian newspaper would face some criticism, but I didn't expect it to turn into a storm of criticism. Scathing questions like "Do you like tea?" - "Yes, I do." - Can you identify the taste of polonium in it?" quickly evolved into name-calling with 'you pig' and 'you sick f***' being least offensive. The posters, who clicked on this AMA started asking questions proceeding from what their media feeds them every day and every hour. They have arranged a major anti-Russian hysterical party, in which they were screaming slogans and headlines from Western publications while calling me an utterly brainwashed individual. This has once again reaffirmed my belief in mass media being a major tool that influences people's minds like nothing else, albeit, unfortunately, in a negative way. Most of the posters, whom, as I believe, were US citizens, started reproducing all those things that the US government has been accusing Russia of for years now non-stop. They started throwing those accusations into my face claiming that Russia dismembered Ukraine and annexed the Crimea. They do not even try to think whether their government was behind the coup in Ukraine. They do not even question that - Russia invaded Ukraine. Period. Before that, Russia had invaded Georgia too. This is the ultimate truth for them. They do not even try to think that the Ukrainian government that came to power as a result of a coup is illegitimate, because their president Yanukovych was nearly killed and toppled illegitimately making sitting president Poroshenko just as illegitimate. Nevertheless, the international community is OK with that. They accuse Russia of Flight MH17 shoot-down even though no one has ever been able to find out yet who caused that tragedy. They do not even try to assume that it could be Ukraine, at least in theory. For them, Russia is guilty. They don't question that. The discussion quickly developed into a full-fledged anti-Russian hysteria at its finest. At one point I had the feeling like I was chatting to a bunch of journalists from Western publications, whose job is to defame and demonise Russia as much as possible. However, those were just people, common people from the United States of America, who, like everyone else, are busy with their daily routines, their work and family, etc. The degree of their aversion to Russia amazed me. In events like this, you try to say something, but you can say only a little, just a few basic things, but they still bounce back denied, misunderstood and criticised. I wanted to be friendly and never wanted to call anyone names in that discussion, but a lot of people took liberties and thought that they have the right to insult brutally. When I wrote in one of the comments that the friendship (if there were any) between Russia and the United States has been buried forever, most of the people did not find it regretful - they were happy about it. For them, Russia is still the empire of evil, sadly. I believe that many of those people would press the red button to nuke Russia if they had such an opportunity. Russophobes calling Russia homophobic - how funny is that? I wonder if they criticise their government. They mock and insult their president, this I know, but they do not seem to be able to question the things that the US government has been doing lately, committing acts of economic and political extremism against so many countries in the world. Barack Obama declared America an exceptional nation (who would have thought he would say such a thing!), which means, as one is led to believe, that the USA is above all others. Sounds like Hitler's "Deutschland über alles" slogan. This exceptional country kills thousands of people wherever US troops are deployed. They ravaged Iraq, Libya, Syria, terrorised Afghanistan and planted a puppet government there, and now they get really mad because they can't do the same to Iran (a nuclear innuendo might be involved). They do not care how many civilians get killed as they sow chaos in the Middle East. The more civilians, including children, die, the better the US feels. As Madeleine Albright said once replying to a question about half a million dead children - "The price is worth it."And, of course, the Americans despise Putin. They despise him for being a strong leader. They despise him for promoting and defending Russian interests. Some poster wished him to die. I guess they would be thrilled to see Russia dying too. I very well remember the time when the West was praising Russia and calling it a democracy as Russia was lying in ruins, while selling its wealth to the West for kopecks. This is what the West wants Russia to be - weak, weak-willed, obedient, controlled, ruined. All in all, Putin showed the West a middle finger to that, that's why they hate him in the first place. Will there be any understanding between Russia and the United States ever? Russian politicians still call their US counterparts "partners" while implying a completely different word. The rhetoric from US politicians gets increasingly twisted every day. All they do is threaten all who disobey, as if the world is their kindergarten. Is it supposed to be an empire of goodness? All empires fall sooner or later. Is the US empire in agony? What a mad world we are all living in. 

Lindsay Lohan apparently hasn’t changed her ways.

Following a disturbing video Lohan, 32, posted on Instagram Live over the weekend in which she appeared to get hit in the face by a stranger, a source close the actress tells PEOPLE, “Lindsay hasn’t changed whatsoever.”

“She’s still partying very hard and drinking a lot,” the insider says. “She’s a nightmare to those around her.”

A rep for Lohan did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment.

While Lohan has since deleted the video, PEOPLE was able to watch it beforehand.

Lohan shared several clips of her night before the incident, in which she could be seen partying in a dark and loud club.

Though it is not immediately clear where the incident happened, TMZ reported she was in Russia, while her most recent Instagram location tags show she was recently in Paris.

In the next video, Lohan, who was in a car, spotted a homeless family sleeping outside and identified them as Syrian refugees.

Seemingly trying to help, Lohan approached the family and said the children could come with her to watch movies “on a television or a computer.” However, when they do not make moves to leave with her, she started to become belligerent. It’s not immediately clear whether the family could understand what she was saying to them.

Lohan accused the parents of trafficking children when they walked passed her car. As she began to follow the family, a female voice could be heard approaching her, after which Lohan lets out an audible gasp and her camera shook.

She then turned the camera around on herself and said she was struck by the woman. “You guys, I’m so scared,” she remarks while crying and grabbing the side of her face. Shortly after, the video ended.

RELATED: Lindsay Lohan Appears to Be Slapped After Accusing Family of ‘Trafficking Children’ in Video

Days earlier, Lohan was spotted in Paris, where she attended the Saint Laurent runway show alongside her brother, model Dakota Lohan, 22.

The actress has recently been spending a lot of time in Mykonos, Greece to film her new reality series, Lohan Beach Club, slated to premiere on MTV in 2019.

Over the past decade, Lohan has been arrested multiple times for offenses like driving under the influence and shoplifting.

Most recently, Lohan received probation and 240 hours of community service after pleading no contest to reckless driving in a June 2012 car crash in Santa Monica.

MTV did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment. | 10/2/18

As an explosive New York Times op-ed about President Donald Trump dominates the headlines, senior officials in the White House are denying on the record that they have any connection to the piece, titled “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration.”

In the essay, an anonymous author claiming to be a senior official within the Trump administration asserted that top White House officials are secretly working to “thwart” the president’s “misguided impulses” and “worst inclinations.” The author also blasted Trump’s “amorality” and “anti-democratic” actions, and accused the president of attacking conservative ideals including “free minds, free markets and free people.”

RELATED: President Trump Suggests Times Made Up Official Who Penned Op-Ed After First Calling It Treason

“Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back,” the author wrote.

Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2018

As speculation around the author’s identity continues to build — with even the president unsure of how to respond to the essay — here are the members of the president’s cabinet who, according to NBC News, have said they did not write the Times op-ed.


Some have pointed to Pence’s affinity for the archaic word “lodestar”, which is used in the op-ed, as a clue that he’s the culprit. But the vice president’s office “definitively denies” that he was the author, and his communications director tweeted that “the Vice President puts his name on his Op-Eds.”

The Vice President puts his name on his Op-Eds. The @nytimes should be ashamed and so should the person who wrote the false, illogical, and gutless op-ed. Our office is above such amateur acts.

— Jarrod Agen (@VPComDir) September 6, 2018


Pompeo said, “It’s not mine” and chastised The Times for taking “a disgruntled deceptive bad actor’s word for anything and put it in their newspaper.”


“Speculation that The New York Times op-ed was written by me or my Principal Deputy is patently false. We did not,” he said in a statement.


“Secretary Nielsen is focused on leading the men and women of DHS and protecting the homeland – not writing anonymous and false opinion pieces for the New York Times,” the agency’s press secretary, Tyler Q. Houlton, said in a statement.

RELATED: Trump Reportedly Requested Official Photos of His Inauguration Have ‘Empty Areas’ Cropped Out


“It was not his op-ed,” chief Pentagon spokesperson Dana White said.


“No, Dir. Mulvaney is not the author,” a spokesperson for Mulvaney told NBC News.


“The Secretary didn’t write the op-ed,” a spokesperson for Carson told NBC News.


“It is laughable to think this could come from the Secretary,” Tony Sayegh Jr., a spokesman for Mnuchin, tweeted.

.@stevenmnuchin1 is honored to serve @POTUS & the American people. He feels it was irresponsible for @nytimes to print this anonymous piece. Now, dignified public servants are forced to deny being the source. It is laughable to think this could come from the Secretary.

— Tony Sayegh Jr. (@tony4ny) September 6, 2018


“Neither Secretary Wilkie nor anyone else at VA wrote the op-ed,” an agency spokesperson told NBC News.


“The Secretary does not play these sophomoric Washington games. He is definitively not the author,” a department spokesperson told NBC News.


“No!” Haspel’s press secretary Tim Barrett said.


“Of course not,” Conway told NBC News.


“Acting Administrator Wheeler supports President Trump 100 percent and is honored to serve in his Cabinet. He also believes whoever wrote the op-ed should resign,” an EPA spokesperson told NBC News.


“No, Secretary Perdue did not write the op-ed,” a department spokesperson told NBC News.


“Administrator McMahon is not the author,” an agency spokesperson told NBC News.


“I am not the author of the New York Times OpEd, nor do I agree with its characterizations,” Perry tweeted.

I am not the author of the New York Times OpEd, nor do I agree with its characterizations. Hiding behind anonymity and smearing the President of the United States does not make you an "unsung hero", it makes you a coward, unworthy of serving this Nation.

— Rick Perry (@SecretaryPerry) September 6, 2018


“I did not write and am thoroughly appalled by this op-ed,” Ross tweeted.

I did not write and am thoroughly appalled by this op-ed. I couldn’t be prouder of our work at Commerce and of @POTUS.

— Sec. Wilbur Ross (@SecretaryRoss) September 6, 2018

RELATED VIDEO: Trump Calls Omarosa Manigault Newman a ‘Dog’ After She Claims He’s Racist and in ‘Mental Decline’


McGahn told reporters, “no,” when they asked if he was the author.


“For those who have inquired, this is to confirm that Secretary Chao is not the author of the op-ed,” a spokesperson told NBC News.


“When you’re serving as the U.S. envoy in Moscow, you’re an easy target on all sides. Anything sent out by me would have carried my name. An early political lesson I learned: never send an anonymous op-ed,” Huntsman said, via a statement tweeted by a spokesperson for the U.S. embassy in Moscow.

Amb Huntsman: Come to find, when you’re serving as the U.S. envoy in Moscow, you’re an easy target on all sides. Anything sent out by me would have carried my name. An early political lesson I learned: never send an anonymous op-ed.

— Andrea Kalan (@USEmbRuPress) September 6, 2018


“No, Secretary Azar did not write the op-ed,” an agency spokesperson told NBC News.


“I did not write it. It does not reflect my views at all, and it does not reflect the views of anyone I know in the Administration,” he said via a statement to NBC News. | 9/6/18

CNN reporters Jim Sciutto and Carl Bernstein offered additional context on Tuesday after Michael Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis, publicly cast doubt on information he provided to them for a widely-circulated story on a 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Trump campaign representatives and a Russian lawyer.

The July 27th CNN story reported that Cohen said he personally witnessed Donald Trump being told about the 2016 meeting between that took place during the height of the presidential campaign in 2016.

If true, the story would contradict President Trump’s assertion that he only learned about the meeting after he was elected.

The bombshell piece came in for scrutiny on Sunday after one of its primary sources, Cohen attorney Lanny Davis, publicly cast doubt on the information he provided to CNN.

Sciutto and Bernstein, however, reiterated that they stand by their reporting, adding that Davis had not been the only confirming source with knowledge of Cohen’s claims about the president’s knowledge of the meeting. The two also strongly hinted at the identity of one of their other confirming sources.

“CNN stands by its story,” they wrote. “[Michael] Cohen, unlike Davis, has not publicly addressed what he might have said to friends, associates or reporters about these matters.”

CNN declined to comment on whether Cohen was, indeed, a source for the article.

Also Read: Lanny Davis, Ex-Harvey Weinstein Legal Adviser, Now Works for Michael Cohen

The network got blowback after Davis backed away from the story, telling The Washington Post on Sunday that he could not confirm the piece.

“Lanny Davis, a spokesman and attorney for Cohen, said in an interview this weekend that he is no longer certain about claims he made to reporters on background and on the record in recent weeks about what Cohen knows about Trump’s awareness of the Russian efforts,” wrote Post reporters Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman.

CNN also previously stood by its reporting, citing the veracity of the other sources involved in the report, but the criticism continued to be fierce.

A tweet from The Hill media reporter Joe Concha, saying the channel had no alternative but to retract, has received more than 5,000 retweets.

“Very difficult to see how CNN can continue to stand by its July 27 Michael Cohen/Trump Tower story given its own formerly-anonymous source is now openly admitting to lying about it on the network,” he said. “Retraction seems to be the only recourse here.”

Very difficult to see how CNN can continue to stand by its July 27 Michael Cohen/Trump Tower story given its own formerly-anonymous source is now openly admitting to lying about it on the network. Retraction seems to be the only recourse here:

— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) August 28, 2018

The story received renewed attention last week after Davis appeared on CNN with Anderson Cooper and bluntly misrepresented his involvement with the story.

“I think the reporting of the story got mixed up in the course of a criminal investigation,” he told Cooper on live television. “We were not the source of the story.”

On Monday evening, he confessed to BuzzFeed that he was, in fact, a source for the CNN report and apologized for saying otherwise to Cooper. “I made a mistake,” he told the website, adding, “I did not mean to be cute.”

Related stories from TheWrap:

Michael Cohen Attorney Outs Himself as Source of Trump-Russia CNN Report

National Enquirer Boss David Pecker Granted Immunity in Michael Cohen Case

What Michael Cohen's Plea Deal Means for Stormy Daniels and American Media

Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort Give 5 MSNBC Shows Their Largest Audiences Ever | 8/28/18

Media of Russia is diverse, with a wide range of broadcast and print outlets are available to the consumer. In total, there are 93,000 media outlets in Russia, including 27,000 newspapers and magazines and 330 television channels. Television is the most popular source of information. There are three television channels with a nationwide outreach, and a multitude of regional channels. Local and national newspapers are the second most popular choice, while the Internet comes third. In all media spheres there is a mixture of private and state-ownership. The three main television channels have often come under criticism for their alleged bias towards the United Russia party and its candidates in their political programs.

From dbpedia, under creative commons CC-BY-SA | hosting | | |